Friday, September 08, 2006

The Steve Irwin Blame Game- Stop It!

I felt compelled to post this after seeing hundreds of viewpoints and supposed experts give their take on the death of Steve Irwin this past week.
One particular post from a respectable blog clinched it for me.
The Discovery Channel Killed Steve Irwin

Let me start out by saying that I follow Calcanis' blog religiously, as it always seems to offer something that matters to me in my daily internet and blogging travels.
In this case, Jason has written a well-thought out "Op-Ed" on the merits of Steve Irwin and the life he led before meeting his demise by one fell swoop of a stingray spike to the heart.

The problem I have with this article in particular is the fact that it was written AFTER Steve's death. Tantamount to bandwagon jumping, sports fans.
How many of us here have scuba-dived among stingrays ourselves?
Being a travel related blog, many of our readers likely have.
Does this behavior make us irresponsible, or worse yet- reckless?
Last I checked, there were no Discovery Channel cameras following me around the Baja Peninsula, yet I choose to spend time recreating there regardless.

Why specifically bring up this article in the first place?
Because Jason chose that particular subject line to get a point across that has little to do with the reason Mr. Irwin is no longer among the living.
A crocodile did not eat him.
A child was not torn from it's father's arms and swallowed whole.
Snakes didn't decide they had seen enough of this guy's antics and just drag him back to their lair some fine day.
Do I agree with the premise of the article's content?
You bet I do, almost to the letter.
It's the "intent" that I feel perpetuates one common denominator on the blog reports:
The Blame Game.

Think about it.
If somebody (or something) needs to be blamed for Steve Irwin's death- blame the stingray.
An incredibly talented man ran into some incredibly bad luck when the world least expected it.
Could have been you, me or any number of divers on this planet, and the world would never have known it.

If there is a lesson we all can take with us in this whole ordeal it's this:
Taunt the crocodiles,snakes and reptiles long enough, and a stingray is bound to get you in the end.

What say you?

The Extreme Tourist: Afghanistan


This is the first in a series of "Extreme Travel" destination articles.
If you have experienced some rather unusual trips of your own, feel free to share them here with a comment!

Travel to Afghanistan contains an inherent amount of risk, and should not be regarded in the same manner as a traditional backpacker's destination. While the security situation in the country was good under the Taliban regime, the Karzai administration has struggled to impose central control on the regions, and ISAF remains largely confined to Kabul and its immediate environs. There has been a return to warlordism in large parts of the country, and certain areas susceptible to banditry or armed instability. Afghanistan is also one of the most heavily land-mined countries in the world. As such, all potential travellers should take steps to reduce their chances of exposing themselves to risk.

Always check the current situation on the ground before entering the country. The best sources are news services and those who have recently visited Afghanistan. News websites are listed under links; also see also Afghanistan Information Management Service (AIMS) and ReliefWeb, which offer security information, such as the weekly World Food Programme Weekly Situation Report. For those working in Afghanistan, the Afghanistan NGO Security Office (ANSO) in Kabul can provide security briefings. Those staying long-term in Afghanistan may also find the ECHO publication Generic Security Guide for Humanitarian Organisations useful, which can be downloaded from their website.

A short wave radio is useful for staying in touch with the news while travelling inside the country. Acquiring a working knowledge of recent Afghan history, local customs and a basic understanding of Islam is also to be highly recommended before travelling. Since 2002, many countries have re-opened their embassies in Kabul. It is worth registering your presence in the country with them, even though they can only provide the most limited consular assistance.

The security situation varies widely across the country, with some areas better than others. The lack of general countrywide security is a result of the failure of the international community to expand their mandate outside Kabul after the fall of the Taliban, and the continued support offered to warlords by the USA. The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) has produced an excellent paper Minimal Investments, Minimal Results: The Failure of Security Policy in Afghanistan which analyses the failure of security provision in the country - published in June 2004 its conclusions are still relevant. Another useful paper is NGO Insecurity in Afghanistan, published in April 2005 by CARE and ANSO.

As a general rule, the eastern and southern provinces of Afghanistan - the Pashtun heartland - should be regarded as extremely high-risk areas for foreigners. Helmand, Oruzgan, Zabol and large parts of Kandahar provinces are the nexus of continued fighting by Taliban remnants, despite US-Afghan army operations and Kabul's efforts to bring some Taliban back into the fold. Kunar, Laghman, Nangahar, Logar, Paktia and Paktika provinces should likewise be regarded as largely off-limits, due to supporters of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, and the proximity to the Pakistan border, where sympathy for al-Qaeda and resentment of the government runs high. These areas are also prone to unpredictable unrest, such as the violent anti-American protests in several Pashtun towns and cities in May 2005.

Bomb attacks and kidnapping of foreigners has increased in Kabul since mid-2004.

The north is generally more stable. Taliban activity is not an issue here, but a more pervasive lawlessness is. Despite the success of the UN's disarmament programme in decommissioning heavy weapons, the country is awash with small arms, and disbanded militias can still present a problem as supporters of local strong-men and enacting banditry. Badghis province in the northwest is the most persistently problematic province for security, and the NGO Medecins Sans Frontieres withdrew completely from Afghanistan after the murder of five of their staff in Badghis in early 2004.

More detailed security information for specific regions is provided on the relevant pages. Even where areas are listed as stable, unexpected or opportune incidents can still occur, and the lack of central state control can mean a lack of trustworthy law enforcement in even the calmest of regions. Again, the need to seek reliable sources of information before travelling should be stressed.

Landmines
Afghanistan is littered with landmines- never walk off the beaten path. If locals avoid a particular area, so should you. Take a guide and don’t walk alone in unknown areas. When travelling by road, stay on the road when answering the call of nature. As well as mines, there is a risk from unexploded ordnance (UXOs), including bomblets dropped by US forces in the 2001-2002 air campaign. A visit to the Landmine Museum run by OMAR (Organisation for Mine Clearance and Afghan Rehabilitation) in Kabul is highly recommended.

Remember, landmines are laid to be invisible.

In Afghanistan, rocks are marked with red paint to signify dangerous areas or known minefields. The rocks are repainted white when the area is cleared. However, not all areas are marked. Landmines and UXOs can be found in the following places:

Unused footpaths and tracks, verges of roads, around culverts and bridge abutments, alongside walls (particularly damaged buildings, around wells and water access points, in irrigation channels, around (abandoned) military posts and destroyed vehicles.

DO NOT touch or move interesting/unknown objects, leave well-worn paths or tracks, or walk in unknown areas without a local guide.

DO seek information on local mine problems and take a local guide, retrace you steps out of a suspect area when possible, stay alert to telltale signs for landmines and UXOs. Trust your judgement and don’t follow others blindly.

If you see a landmine or UXO: stop, stay calm and think. Shout a warning to others near you, and turn around and retrace your steps slowly and exactly. Once on safe ground, mark the danger area with a line of rocks and inform the nearest NGO demining office or authorities immediately.

(Landmine guidelines reproduced with thanks to the Essential Field Guide: Afghanistan.)

General Health
A malaria risk exists in regions of Afghanistan under an elevation of 2000m. June to November is the primary transmission season, and although the disease is mainly found in rural areas, a high risk exists in the cities of Kandahar and Jalalabad where agricultural and residential areas overlap. Kabul lies above the malarial zone. Take anti-malarial precautions where necessary. Diarrhoea is also a risk when travelling - carry oral rehydration salts and do not assume water is safe to drink unless treated to make it so. Depleted uranium (DU) weapons were used on a large scale in Afghanistan by the US army, which may present a large-scale future health risk for the population.
VIA LINK

Are You Safe On A Cruise Ship?



Disturbing tales about cruise vacations are more common than we'd like. Numerous passengers have disappeared from cruise ships, including George Smith IV, whose family is currently suing Royal Caribbean. The Crown Princess tilted sharply on one of its first voyages, injuring dozens of guests, and the Star Princess caught on fire, destroying balconies on several decks. Last year, modern-day pirates attacked a Seabourn ship off the coast of Somalia.

All of these scary incidents lead holidaymakers to wonder: Am I safe taking a cruise vacation?

The answer is a conditional yes. In today's uncertain world, you can never be completely safe anywhere. Going on a cruise does not put you in greater peril than does any other vacation. But, the responsibility ultimately falls to you to protect yourself and your interests while onboard.
FULL ARTICLE...

Passport Delays Loom for Short-Hop Cruisers


Don't wait much longer to get a passport if you're planning a winter cruise to the Caribbean or Mexico.


Industry watchers such as Mike Driscoll expect delays at passport offices in the weeks leading up to Jan. 8, which is the day new government rules take effect. The rules require all cruisers to carry passports, even on three-day trips.

Previously, many itineraries required that the passenger have only a driver's license and birth certificate.

"There could be a surge in applications come January," says Driscoll, editor of Cruise Week newsletter. "By the time October rolls around, cruisers booked for January who don't have a passport likely will require expedited service, which doubles the cost."
READ ON...

Sex On a Plane- For $299?

Looking for more Wacky and Weird News?

Visit Our FORUM!


Georgia corporate pilot Bob Smith has a soaring sideline: helping couples join the infamous "mile-high club." For $299, he'll take a frisky twosome past 5,280 feet in a Piper Cherokee 6 fitted with a mattress. The hour-long flights out of Carrollton, Ga., have lured couples from as far as New York. Smith, 51, shares stories of highflying whoopee with USA TODAY's Kitty Bean Yancey.

Q: Who goes on these flights?

A: Couples from 18 and 19 up to their 60s. I've taken between 75 and 100 in five years. I've had people fly in from New York, New Jersey and Miami just to do the mile-high club. It's a lot easier (for them) than getting in the bathroom of a 737.

Q: Do men or women usually book the flights?

A: About 75% of the flights are booked by women. I've tried to figure that out, and I guess if the guy suggested it to a woman, he would be afraid she'd think he was some kind of pervert. But if the woman suggests it, the man thinks she's hot.

Q: But your plane is small. Aren't people embarrassed to fool around with you there?

A: No. I've got a curtain up so I can't see what's going on, and I wear a headset. But I guess the ones who want to (take a mile-high flight) aren't the inhibited type anyway.

Q: Don't you have to interrupt them to tell them when you're going to land?
READ ON....

Travel Gossip Home Page